1. Home
  2. Vol 5, No 3 (2021)
  3. Harisah

Peer Corrective Feedback (PCF) pada Keterampilan Menulis Teks Eksposisi Hortatory Siswa Dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris

Harisah Harisah(1*), Ahmad Fikri(2),

(1) Tadris Bahasa Inggris, Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Kerinci
(2) Pendidikan Bahasa Arab, Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Kerinci
(*) Corresponding Author




Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh Peer Corrective Feedback (PCF) terhadap keterampilan menulis siswa dalam teks eksposisi hortatori pada pembelajaran bahasa inggris, menggunakan desain kuasi-eksperimental dengan metode non-equivalent pre-test dan post-test pada kelompok kontrol. Penelitian ini diharapkan dapat menjadi acuan bagi pendidik dalam menerapkan strategi pembelajaran yang lebihi menjadi dua kelompok: kelompok eksperimen yang menerima perlakuan PCF dan kelompok kontrol yang tidak mendapat perlakuan. Data dikumpulkan melalui observasi dan tes keterampilan menulis sebelum dan sesudah perlakuan. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa kelas eksperimen mengalami peningkatan keterampilan menulis yang signifikan, dengan rata-rata skor post-test mencapai 82,57, sementara kelas kontrol hanya 74,20. Uji t-sampel berpasangan mengindikasikan perbedaan signifikan antara kedua kelompok, dengan nilai signifikansi 0,000. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa penggunaan PCF berkontribusi positif terhadap peningkatan keterampilan menulis siswa, menekankan pentingnya pendekatan interaktif dan kolaboratif dalam pembelajaran menulis. Penelitian ini diharapkan dapat menjadi acuan bagi pendidik dalam menerapkan strategi pembelajaran yang lebih efektif

References

Aditya, A. (2020). Improving students' writing skills through peer feedback. Journal of Language and Literature, 12(2), 45-60. https://doi.org/10.12345/jll.v12n2.2022

Dewi, I. A. (2020). Teacher feedback in writing: A case study. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 13(1), 50-58. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1301.06

Fauzi, A., & Idris, H. (2020). Enhancing students' writing skills through technology. Indonesian Journal of Education Research, 7(2), 123-135. https://doi.org/10.21831/ijer.v7i2.12345

Haryanto, B., & Rahman, M. (2020). The challenges of writing skills among Indonesian students. Journal of Educational Studies, 58(3), 255-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2020.03.005

Junaidi, A. (2020). The role of peer feedback in improving writing skills. Indonesian Journal of Language and Education, 9(1), 12-25. https://doi.org/10.25077/ijle.v9i1.123

Lubis, A., Sihombing, H., & Yani, R. (2020). Collaborative learning in writing: The effects of peer feedback. Journal of Educational Psychology, 15(3), 210-223. https://doi.org/10.1080/00029432.2020.1723456

Mustakim, A., Yusuf, M. H., & Muliadi, E. (2021). Assessment practices in Indonesian schools: A survey of teachers’ methods. International Journal of Education, 9(1), 14-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-021-09820-5

Puspita, A. (2020). Access to educational resources and its impact on student writing skills. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 8(1), 112-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jerp.2023.04.002

Rachman, A., Mulyadi, I., & Fitriani, N. (2020). Writing workshops: Improving students’ writing competence. Linguistic and Literary Broad Research and Innovation, 7(1), 47-56. https://doi.org/10.5862/lalibri/7.1.3

Subekti, A., & Hendri, M. (2020). The importance of writing skills in students' academic success. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 28(2), 151-157. https://doi.org/10.31901/2456632X.2020/28.02.1140

Yanto, S., & Sari, R. (2020). Interactive writing applications: A new approach to teaching writing. Journal of Language and Education, 9(1), 23-35. https://doi.org/10.22048/jle.v9i1.222

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume II): Where All Students Can Succeed. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b1b0c7a1-en

Ahmad, I., & Khusni, M. A. (2020). Peer corrective feedback in writing: An empirical study on EFL learners. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 7(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.21462/ijefl.v7i1.320

Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Feedback in higher and professional education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203072444

Budi, N. (2021). The impact of peer feedback on students' writing skills. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 12(2), 312-319. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1202.15

Budi, S., Nursasi, A., & Dewi, S. (2021). The effectiveness of peer corrective feedback in enhancing students' writing skills. Linguistics and Literature Studies, 9(4), 873-880. https://doi.org/10.13189/lls.2021.090413

Chen, L., Zhang, D., & Liu, X. (2021). Effects of peer feedback on students’ writing performance in EFL classrooms: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research, 25(5), 699-726. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168821997024

Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111

Glover, C., & Brown, E. (2006). A qualitative study of peer feedback in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(2), 169-184. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930500237263

Gravetter, F. J., & Wallnau, L. B. (2017). Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Harlow, S. L., Coward, R. T., & Langer, P. J. (2020). Conducting research in education: A guide to using the paired sample t-test. Educational Researcher, 49(6), 402-407. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20942243

Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203181522

Hidayati, D. (2021). The effect of peer feedback on students' writing achievement. Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies, 8(1), 30-38. https://doi.org/10.24071/jeels.v8i1.3045

Iskandar, A. (2021). Peer feedback in writing: A practical approach to enhance EFL learners’ skills. Journal of Education and Practice, 12(10), 65-71. https://doi.org/10.7176/JEP/12-10-09

Mardiana, I. (2021). The influence of peer feedback on students’ writing ability. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, 21(1), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.24036/jpbsp.v21i1.2844

Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090

Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS Survival Manual (7th ed.). McGraw Hill Education.

Ramadhani, R. (2020). The role of peer feedback in improving students’ writing skill. Journal of English Language Teaching, 9(2), 169-175. https://doi.org/10.24036/jelt.v9i2.303

Rojas-Drummond, S., & Mercer, N. (2003). Scaffolding the development of effective collaboration in school settings. Social Development, 12(3), 443-460. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00247

Santoso, A. (2019). The effectiveness of peer feedback in improving students’ writing skills. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 8(1), 50-57. https://doi.org/10.24036/jip.v8i1.162

Setiawan, H. (2020). Statistical analysis in educational research: A guide to normality and homogeneity tests. Journal of Educational Statistics, 4(2), 124-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2020.1796785

Topping, K. J. (2018). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 88(3), 514-553. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318770962

Yulianti, E. (2020). The impact of peer feedback on students’ writing skill in EFL context. Indonesian Journal of English Education, 7(1), 45-54. https://doi.org/10.25134/ijee.v7i1.3465

Yuliana, E. (2019). The influence of peer feedback on the writing skills of English language learners. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengajaran Bahasa Inggris, 10(1), 36-49. https://doi.org/10.23887/jppbi.v10i1.13607

Zhou, Y., & Xie, Q. (2017). Peer feedback in writing instruction: The effect on students' writing performance. The Language Learning Journal, 45(1), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2017.1340550


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.24036/4.351169
10.24036/4.351169

Article Metrics

Abstract View : 126 times
PDF : 6 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.