1. Home
  2. Vol 2, No 2 (2018)
  3. Enidar

The Effectiveness of Developing Contextual Material For Teaching English at Madrasah Aliyah

Enidar Enidar(1*), Mukhaiyar Mukhaiyar(2), Z Mawardi Effendi(3), Zul Amri(4),

(1) 
(2) 
(3) 
(4) Universitas Negeri Padang
(*) Corresponding Author




Abstract

One of the aspects that determine the success of the learning process is teaching materials.  This research aimed to develop the effectiveness of contextual material for teaching English at Madrasah Aliyah.  The design of this research is development research by using ADDIE model. The product consists of two books, (teacher's book and students'book) the title is “English For Us”.  Subjects in this research were all students of grade X. Sample were 87 persons and it was selected by using the purposive technique. The instrument used to collect data was a survey, questionnaires, and an interview. Data analysis was used the qualitative and quantitative technique. The practicalities of the teacher’s book were 82.54   and students’ book showed an average  84.63 score. The effectiveness of a product is measured through pre-test is 68,00  and post-test is 75.44.  It can be concluded that the contextual material for teaching English at Madrasah Aliyah was effective

References

Ansyar, Muhammad (2015). Kurikulum; Hakikat, Fondasi, Disain, & Pengembangan. (in press)

Birisçi, S., & Metin, M. (2010). Developing an instructional material using a concept cartoon adapted to the 5E model: A sample of teaching erosion. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 11(1), 1–16.

Branch, Robert Maribe (2009) Instructional Design:The ADDIE Approach. USA.Springer

Cakir, Mustafa (2008). ConstructivistApproachesto LearninginScienceand Their Implicationsfor SciencePedagogy:A Literature Review. InternationalJournalofEnvironmental &ScienceEducation, (Online), Vol. 3, No. 4, (http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ894860.pdf, diakses tanggal 14 Juni 2015).

Depdiknas. (2006). Pedoman Memilih dan Menyusun Bahan Ajar. Jakarta.

Djauhari. (2006). Panduan Pengembangan Bahan Ajar. Jakarta: Depdiknas

Degeng,IN.S.(1998). Strategi Pembelajaran: Kajian Teori dan Aplikasi. Jurnal Suber Belajar, Januari. 1 (1), 17-31).

Diaz-Rico, Lynne T. (2008). Strategies for teaching English learner-2nd ed.USAPearson Education, Inc.

Djauhari, M. Siddiq, dkk. (2006). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar. Direktorat Jendral Pedidikan Tinggi Depdiknas.

Eby, Judy W. (1996). Reflecting Planning,Teaching, and Evaluation. Second Edition. Columbus, Ohio.San Diego State University: Person Education

Johnson, Elaine B. (2007). Contextual teaching and learning,Penerjemah: Ibnu Setiawan, Bandung, Mizan Learning Center

Kemendikbud. (2013) (Modul) Materi Pelatihan Guru ‘Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 SMP- Bahasa Inggris: Jakarta, Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan.

Mackey, W.F. 1986. Analisis Bahasa. Surabaya: Usaha Nasional.

McBrien, J.L. dan R.S. Brandt. (2012). The Language of Learning: A Guide to Education. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Muslich, Masnur. (2010). Fonologi Bahasa Indonesia.Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. @Digital Library of State University of Malang.http://library.um.ac .id

Mueller, John. (2008). Authentic AssessmentToolbox. North Central Collegehttp://www.noctrl.edu/,Naperville, ttp://jonathan.-mueller.faculty.noctrl.edu/toolbox/index.htm (Diunduh 27 Agustus2008).

Niu-Cooper, R. (2012). Unexpected realities: Lesson from china`s new english textbook implementation. International Journal of Education policy and Leadership, 7(2), 1-17. Tersedia pada: http://www.ijepl.org. Diakses pada 17 Oktober 2012

Nurhadi (2002) .Pendekatan Kontekstual. Malang. Universitas Negeri Malang

Onrstein, Allan C &Francis P.Hunkins. 2009. Curriculum Foundation, Principles, and Isues. (fifth edition) Pearson,USA

Pannen, Paulina dan Purwanto.(2001). Penulisan Bahan Ajar. Jakarta: Pusat Antar

Universitas untuk Peningkatan dan Pengembangan Aktivitas Intruksional Ditjen Dikti Diknas.

Print, Murray. (1993). Curricum Development and Design. Sydney: Allen & Unwin

Rita C. Richey, J. D. K., Wayne A. Nelson. (1996). DevelopmentalResearch : Studies of Instructional Design and Development.

Rusman. (2011).Model-Model Pembelajaran: Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru.Bandung. Rajawali Pers.

Suparno. Paul. (1997). Filsafat Konstruktivisme dalam Pendidikan.Yogyakarta: Kanisius

Santosa. 2014. e-Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Program Studi Teknologi Pembelajaran (Volume 4)

Sanjaya, Wina.(2010). Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan, Jakarata: Kencana

Seels, Barbara B & Richey, Rita. 1994. Instructional Technology: the definition and domain of the field. Washington DC

Smith, (2010). Instructional strategies in family and consumer sciences: Implementing the contextual teaching and learning pedagogical model. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences Education, 28 (1), 23-28.Tersedia pada http://www.natefacs.org.

Tichapondwa.( 2006). Pengembangan Buku Teks Bahasa Inggris Kontekstual Sebagai Upaya Menciptakan Situasi Belajar Aktif Bagi Siswa Kelas VII SMP. e-Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Program Studi Teknologi Pembelajaran (Volume 4 Tahun 2014)

Van den Akker J., dkk. (1993). Educational Design Research. Londonand New York: Routledge.

Widodo & Jasmadi. (2008). Panduan Menyusun Bahan Ajar Berbasis Kompetensi Jakarta. Penerbit Elex Media Komputindo

Trianto (2007). Model Pembelajaran Terpadu dalam Teori dan Praktek. Surabaya: Prestasi Pustaka


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.24036/4.22123
10.24036/4.22123

Article Metrics

Abstract View : 437 times
PDF : 223 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Enidar Enidar

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.