Self Disclosure Instrument: Instrument Standardization through Rasch Model

Reza Tririzky(1*), Daharnis Daharnis(2), Zadrian Ardi(3), Ade Herdian Putra(4),

(1) Universitas Negeri Padang
(2) Universitas Negeri Padang
(3) Universitas Negeri Padang
(4) Universitas Negeri Padang
(*) Corresponding Author




Abstract

The understanding of the extent to which humans can express themselves can be one of the efforts in overcoming various problems that humans face that requires a well-standardized tool. The purpose of this study is to standardize the self-disclosure instrument through the Rasch model. Data collection for this study involved 53 research participants from a high school in Bandung City, West Java. The collected data was then processed and analyzed using the Rasch model with the Winstep application. It was found that out of the 24 initial statement items, 4 did not meet the Rasch model testing criteria. The remaining 20 items could be further utilized in the research. This instrument can then be further utilized in tracing and understanding individual self-disclosure that supports the intervention process to increase self-disclosure.

References

Aryadoust, V., Tan, H. A. H., & Ng, L. Y. (2019). A Scientometric Review of Rasch Measurement: The Rise and Progress of a Specialty. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2197. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02197

Bayne, R. (1977). The Meaning and Measurement of Self-Disclosure. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 5(2), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069887708258111

Boone, W. J., Yale, M. S., & Staver, J. R. (2014). Rasch analysis in the human sciences. In Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6857-4

Cozby, P. C. (1973). Self-disclosure: A Literature Review. Psychological Bulletin, 79(2), 73–91. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033950

Dini, F., Dalimunthe, S., Darmana, A., Suyanti, R., Muchtar, Z., & Sudrajat, A. (2023). Comparasional Analysis of Statistical Results Using the Rasch and Anates Model in Chemistry Learning. In Proceedings of the 8th Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership, AISTEEL 2023, 19 September 2023, Medan, North Sumatera Province, Indonesia. EAI. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.19-9-2023.2340586

Farber, B. A. (2006). Self-disclosure in Psychotherapy. Guilford Press.

Ferguson, K., Ireland, C. A., & Ireland, J. L. (2013). Developing a Self?report Measure to Assess Disclosure Strategies in Adult Male Prisoners and Its Association With Personality. Journal of Forensic Practice, 15(2), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.1108/14636641311322287

Hurley, J. R., & Hurley, S. J. (1969). Toward authenticity in measuring self-disclosure. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 16(3), 271–274. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027390

Laban, G. (2024). Studying and Eliciting Self-Disclosure: Interdisciplinary Review of Research Methodologies and Behavioural Paradigms. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/fhdek

Latifah, M., Saripah, I., Suryana, D., & Sunarya, Y. (2024). Validity and Reliability of Self-Concept Instrument Using Rasch Model. Jurnal Kajian Bimbingan Dan Konseling, 9(1), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.17977/um001v9i12024p26-35

Leung, L. (2002). Loneliness, self-disclosure, and ICQ (“ I seek you”) use. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 5(3), 241–251.

Li, Y., Root, J. C., Atkinson, T. M., & Ahles, T. A. (2016). Examining the Association between Patient-Reported Symptoms of Attention and Memory Dysfunction with Objective Cognitive Performance: A Latent Regression Rasch Model Approach. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology : The Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 31(4), 365–377. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acw017

Mohamed, N., Sulaiman, W. S. W., Halim, F. wati, & Masodi, M. S. (2021). An Initial Analysis of Reliability and Validity of a Personality Instrument Using the Rasch Measurement Model. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(9). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v11-i9/11251

Nabity-Grover, T., Thatcher, J. B., & Johnston, A. C. (2022). Contextualizing Self-disclosure to the Online Environment: An Assessment of the Literature. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 50(1), 754–802. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.05035

Pedersen, D. M., & Breglio, V. J. (1968). The Correlation of two Self-Disclosure Inventories with Actual Self-Disclosure: A Validity Study. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 68(2), 291–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1968.10543436

Putra, A. H., & Mudjiran, M. (2023). Keberhasilan Konseling ditinjau dari Self-Disclosure Klien: Studi pada Klien yang Berasal dari Indonesia. Jurnal Riset Psikologi, 6(4), 190-201.

Rains, S. A., Brunner, S. R., & Oman, K. A. (2014). Self-Disclosure and New Communication Technologies. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 33(1), 42–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407514562561

Schug, J., Yuki, M., & Maddux, W. (2010). Relational Mobility Explains Between- and Within-Culture Differences in Self-Disclosure to Close Friends. Psychological Science, 21(10), 1471–1478. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610382786

Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2015). Aplikasi Pemodelan Rasch Pada Assessment Pendidikan. Trim Komunikata.

Sung, Y.-K., Kim, H., Cha, S. J., Kim, S.-H., Ndosi, M., & Cho, S.-K. (2021). Developing the Korean Educational Needs Assessment Tool (Korean ENAT) in rheumatoid arthritis: cross-cultural validation using Rasch analysis. The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine, 36(4), 1014–1022. https://doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2019.422

Tian, Y., Wang, L., Xu, Y., & He, Z. (2020). The Development of Chinese Version of Transcultural Nursing Self-Efficiency Scale: Using Rasch Model Analysis. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 32(1), 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043659619896827

Wahyuningsih, S. (2021). Using the Rasch’s Partial Credit Model to Analyze the Quality of an Essay Math Test. In Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210508.073

Wheeless, L. R. (1976). Self?Disclosure and Interpersonal Solidarity: Measurement, Validation, and Relationships. Human Communication Research, 3(1), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1976.tb00503.x

Wheeless, L. R., & Grotz, J. (1976). Conceptualization and Measurement of Reported Self?Disclosure. Human Communication Research, 2(4), 338–346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1976.tb00494.x

Wheeless, L. R., & Grotz, J. (1977). The Measurement of Trust and Its Relationship To Self?Disclosure. Human Communication Research, 3(3), 250–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1977.tb00523.x

Xie, X. (2023). Book Review of Rasch Models for Solving Measurement Problems: Invariant Measurement in the Social Sciences by Engelhard Jr. and Wang. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 11(3), 306–307. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.11n.3p.306

Yan, Z. (2020). Developing a Short Form of the Self-Assessment Practices Scale: Psychometric Evidence. Frontiers in Education, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00153

Yan, Z., Brubacher, S., Boud, D., & Powell, M. (2020). Psychometric properties of the Self?assessment Practice Scale for professional training contexts: evidence from confirmatory factor analysis and Rasch analysis. International Journal of Training and Development, 24(4), 357–373. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijtd.12201

Yasin, R. M., Yunus, F. A. N., Rus, R. C., Ahmad, A., & Rahim, M. B. (2015). Validity and Reliability Learning Transfer Item Using Rasch Measurement Model. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 204, 212–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.143


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.24036/0051245ijaccs
10.24036/0051245ijaccs

Article Metrics

Abstract View : 4 times
PDF : 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.